Multiple B-Box RCP controllers forming a larger distributed converter control system.

Distributed converter control

Advanced power electronics control solutions

Modular power converter control for superior performance and flexibility

Thanks to the RealSync technology, the B-Box RCP and B-Board PRO (incl. TPI8032) support the implementation of distributed converter control techniques over the network.

Indeed, control devices can be easily interconnected to form advanced control solutions and implement all sorts of control loops, executed centrally or in a distributed fashion.

Imperix distributed converter control solutions in three points

With the B-Box RCP and B-Board PRO, flexible and scalable control systems can be implemented by simply stacking hardware units, or arranging them in more complex configurations. In essence, our distributed converter control solutions rely on three pillars:

  • Flexible master/slave and/or master/master configurations (see below)
  • Distributed modulation (read more)
  • Ultra-fast communication (read more)
What is distributed converter control?

Distributed control refers to various arrangements of control (sub)systems that rely on some sort of communication between them.

Consequently, distributed converter control systems distinguish by implementing several processing devices (e.g. DSP, FPGA), at different structural or hierarchical locations.

One technology for multiple objectives

Distributed control is applicable to numerous scenarios. Two smart inverters exchanging some information is already some sort of distributed control. Alternatively, a large converter controller with a high number of I/Os probably also requires several FPGAs, and therefore some distribution of the control.

In all cases, thanks to the imperix  RealSync technology, there are virtually no limitations to how devices can be interconnected to form more advanced converter controllers.

Centralized converter control

Centralized control designates controller arrangements where all control loops are closed through the same processing device.

As such, all data are retrieved up to some central point. Besides, slave units are not contributing significantly to the control.


  • Low-complexity systems
  • Laboratory converter prototypes
  • Interleaved systems (conventionally)
Coordinated converter control

Coordinated control occurs when multiple controllers exchange some data but remain essentially independent.

Therefore, coordinated control typically implements several control loops, which are closed in different processing devices.


  • Back-to-back inverters
  • Microgrid (smart) inverters
  • Distributed motor drives (e.g. traction)
Hierarchized converter control

Hierarchized control refers to systems that possess various local and global control loops, closed in different locations.

In practice, control hierarchization is often used to balance the computational burden and/or reduce data exchanges. 


  • Modular Multilevel Converters
  • High-performance motion control
  • Paralleled inverters (to some extent)

Networked control solutions

Flexible control architectures

The above-described distributed control solutions naturally implement various types of data exchanges between the controller units. Imperix distinguishes three different interconnection modes for its RealSync compatible programmable controllers. In essence, there are three possible types of communication:

  • The I/O extension mode is the easiest to use as it only requires to interconnect control devices with an SFP fiber and flash some code in the master. Slaves can be instantly addressed entirely transparently from the peripheral blocks in Simulink/PLECS/C code.
  • The parallel mode operates through CAN or Ethernet. Therefore, it requires that the control software is developed, on both sides, for sending or receiving specific information. There are specific I/O blocks for that.
  • The combined mode benefits from both approaches. Vertical exchanges are handled transparently (using the device ID), while horizontal exchanges use SFP/CAN/ETH blocks directly from within the user file or code.
Distributed converter control for a multi-phase boost DC/DC converter.
I/O extension mode

Vertical data exchanges

The slave devices only operate as I/O extension units for the master. As such, only their FPGAs are operating.

This mode only supports centralized control.

Max. num. of masters1
Max. num. of slaves64
Native (RealSync)
Slaves addressing mode
SynchronizationNative (RealSync)
Exchange directionVertical only
Distributed converter control for a back-to-back NPC inverter system.
Parallel mode

Horizontal data exchanges

Master devices exchange data in order to mutually influence their operation. CPUs on both sides are active.

This mode is useful for coordinated control.

Max. num. of mastersUnlimited
Max. num. of slavesN/A
SynchronizationNot available
Exchange directionHorizontal only
Distributed converter control for a MMC inverter.
Combined mode

Vertical and horizontal data exchanges

Both I/O extension and parallel modes are simultaneously active. Various types of data exchanges occur, often at different rates.

This mode is required for hierarchized control.

Max. num. of masters16
Max. num. of slaves16×64=1024
SFP (RealSync)
Also ETH/CAN (slower)
Native (RealSync)
Slaves addressing mode
SynchronizationNative (RealSync)
Exchange directionVertical + Horizontal

I/O extension mode

Master + slave operation

I/O extension of one converter control system, thanks to SFP communication.
Easy-to-use centralized control architecture

In this mode, there is only one control file/project (e.g. Simulink file) to edit, update and debug. Also, all measurements and variables are accessible at one point. This greatly simplifies the simulation and debugging during control software development. In this mode:

  • Only the master has its CPU operating
  • All FPGAs are tied to the same CPU (inside the master)
  • Communication and synchronization are native (RealSync over SFP)
  • Only one converter controller exists
  • Only one control executable is needed (e.g. Simulink file or C/C++ project)
  • CPU processing performance is often sufficient, even for complex algorithms
  • Multi-rate control is already possible in this mode, thanks to different interrupts
  • Data exchanges between master and slaves uses imperix’s RealSync protocol
  • No configuration is needed. All data are automatically sent from/to the master
  • Data exchanges are full-duplex and entirely deterministic
  • Latency is extremely low (largely sub-us)
  • Slaves operate in the same clock domain as the master
  • No configuration is needed. All slaves are automatically synchronized
  • Synchronization accuracy is ±2ns

Parallel mode

Multi-master operation

The conventional approach for coordinated control

This is the most usual way to implement distributed converter control. Since both masters are executing their own converter control file/project (e.g. Simulink file), the latter must manage the communication explicitly. On the other hand, since the communication makes use of non-proprietary protocols (e.g. CAN/Ethernet), this mode is also able to interface with third-party products and devices.

Multi-master communication for the distributed control of power inverters.

In this mode:

  • Each master has its CPU operating
  • Each FPGA is tied to its neighboring CPU
  • Only basic synchronization is available (IEEE1588)
  • Data exchanges use from/goto functions or blocks
  • Distinct controllers are implemented
  • Each controller requires its own control file (Simulink or C/C++).
  • Distributed control can be implemented, even when controllers are independent
  • The overall computation capability is proportional to the number of units
  • Data exchanges between devices are made using Ethernet or CAN (flexible)
  • Communication is user-configured using from/goto function blocks
  • Data transmission delays vary with traffic
  • Latency is significant (can be >100µs)
  • Devices operate in different clock domains
  • RealSync is not available (SFP only)
  • Synchronization can be achieved using IEEE1588, but with limited accuracy 

Combined mode

Multi-master operation with slaves

Conventional control distribution between two large power converters.
Elementary distributed converter control

When Ethernet or CAN is used for horizontal communication, distributed converter control is possible, but accurate synchronization is not available.

In this mode:

  • Each master has its CPU operating
  • Each FPGA is tied to its neighboring CPU
  • Only poor synchronization is available (IEEE1588)
  • Data exchanges use from/goto functions or blocks
High-performance distributed control for large power converters.
A boundless range of hierarchized control solutions

When the SFP fibers and the RealSync protocol are used for horizontal communication, all converter control units are natively synchronized. Besides, much faster – and full deterministic – data transfers are also guaranteed.

In this mode:

  • Each master has its CPU operating
  • FPGAs are tied to their respective masters
  • All units are natively and perfectly synchronized
  • All data exchanges use SFP+ (galvanically-isolating fibers)
  • Distinct controllers are implemented
  • Each master+slaves group requires a control file (Simulink or C/C++)
  • Control can be distributed or hierarchized among complex controllers
  • The overall computation capability is a function of the number of masters
  • Data exchanges inside master-slaves groups are transparent (I/O extension).
  • Exchanges between masters is user-configured with from/goto function blocks
  • SFP offers widely superior performance over CAN/Ethernet
  • Latency is extremely low with RealSync
  • All devices are in the same clock domain
  • No configuration is needed. All slaves are automatically synchronized to the master
  • Synchronization accuracy is ±2ns

Distributed converter control implementation

Application examples

Here are some examples of distributed converter control strategies, implemented using imperix products.


Distributed MMC inverter control

The control of Modular Multilevel Converters is a well-known example of a very demanding application, which requires a rigorous control hierarchization.

For instance:

  • Global control loops (e.g. grid currents/voltage) are executed in the top controller (master).
  • Faster control loops (e.g. arm currents/energies) are run within phase controllers (masters).
  • Submodules possess local controllers for management and/or control purposes (slaves).


Distributed inverter drives

When multiple electric motor drives must be coordinated, for instance for distributed traction, control hierarchization is essential.

For instance:

  • Current and/or torque control is executed locally, within fast control loops.
  • Speed and/or power control is executed globally, at a slower rate.